| Which Small Biotech Firms Could Reap Benefits From Government's Flu Vaccine Initiative? | | Print | |
| Written by Peter DePalma | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Monday, 25 May 2009 03:00 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"While firms that win a contract from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to make a vaccine or therapy against the new flu strain possibly stand to make it big, other companies, too, are reaping the benefits of having their newer, yet unproven, technologies suddenly thrust into the spotlight," said Rodman & Renshaw analyst Elemer Piros. "A lot of these companies would like to take advantage of this situation because they want to showcase their technology," he said. "What this really means is a great PR campaign." The government currently is seeking information about new technologies that may possibly act against the H1N1 flu strain. However, HHS only wants companies that meet the criteria for its technology readiness level 7 or greater, meaning those firms with products in Phase II development and GMP manufacturing process capabilities, Piros noted. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention hopes to deliver one or both to vaccine manufacturers by the end of next week so scientists can begin the months-long process of producing shots. “Preparation and planning are critical to keep Americans safe in the face of a potential pandemic,” Secretary Sebelius said. “Our goal throughout this new H1N1 outbreak has been to stay one step ahead of the virus. An important part of this effort has been our work to develop a potential vaccine because vaccines can help prevent and control influenza virus outbreaks. The actions we are taking today will help us be prepared if a vaccine is needed.”
The funds will be used to place new orders on existing contracts with companies that hold U.S. licenses for flu vaccines. With these orders, they will produce a bulk supply of vaccine antigen and adjuvant. Antigen is the active ingredient in a vaccine that causes the human body’s immune system to develop antibodies that help fight an invading virus. Depending on the results of clinical studies, adjuvants could be added to a vaccine to improve the immune system’s response and potentially reduce the amount of antigen necessary for the body to recognize and fight a virus. Having both antigen and adjuvant on hand provides maximum flexibility in a future immunization program, if a program is recommended. For example, if needed these ingredients could be used in vaccine to help protect health providers and other members of the critical workforce, as recommended by the National Strategy for Pandemic Influenza. As reported in BioMedReports this past week, HEB is expecting to hear from the FDA this coming week as to whether Ampligen receives approval as a Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) treatment. With the "boats loads" of safety data available, Ampligen could quickly be developed for H1N1 flu strain, Piros said. He noted that Hemispherx already has been in discussions with the CDC about its product. If the Japanese data is deemed credible, and CDC experiments show protection against the H1N1 virus by using Ampligen as an adjuvant, "then you don't need another vaccine. You just mix in this adjuvant with whatever you make every season," Rodman & Renshaw's Piros said. While it is all speculation for now, "it could be the biggest surprise ever," he said. Could it be that these institutional investors are looking beyond HEB's pending FDA decision and more at the potential "flu market windfall?"
Another small biotech who has thrown their hat in the ring is Rockville, Md.-based Novavax Inc. (Nasdaq: NVAX), which is in Phase II development of its VLP-based recombinant seasonal influenza vaccine has the necessary certified GMP manufacturing capabilities for producing up to 30 million doses of vaccine if necessary. Using its VLP technology, Novavax builds a structure similar to a virus, without the genetic material required for viral replication, and a VLP vaccine can be produced using recombinant DNA technology starting with the viral genetic sequence information. Therefore, Singhvi believes, the timeframe for making a vaccine can be shrunk from the normal four months to six months to between 10 weeks and 12 weeks. "With these innovations, we can make a significant improvement in the speed with which a new vaccine can be created to address potential emerging diseases," he said. On Friday, CDC scientists unveiled the most detailed genetic examination yet of the novel virus, finding that the new swine flu may have been circulating undetected in pigs for years. That report, in the journal Science, still fails to solve the bigger mystery of when and where the virus made the jump to people and what genetic change allowed it to start spreading so rapidly (see the alarming related video about how the H1N1 virus is spreading quickly througout Wisconsin). The virus was first detected last month, and at least 42 countries now have confirmed it in more than 11,000 people. At least 85 people have died from it. The confirmed cases don’t represent anywhere near the full scope of the outbreak: For every reported case of swine flu, there may be 20 people sickened with it, said CDC’s Dr. Anne Schuchat — more than 100,000 people in the U.S. There are signs that it is declining in parts of the country, although school-related outbreaks in New York City and elsewhere have led to the closings of about 60 schools affecting 42,000 students, Schuchat said. Tom Bustamante, the Managing Partner at Ludlow BioVenture's commented, "Their can be no doubt that a bulk of this funding will find its way to the major players in vaccine production, such as Sanofi-Aventis (SASY.PA), Novartis (NOVN.VX), and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK.L). "Unlike other vaccine makers, Novavax uses a unique process separated from old egg-based technology, which in turn provides for not only cheaper production costs, but a much greater turn around to end product." Investors interested in seeing BioMedReport's complete database of clinical trials and upcoming FDA decisions can access that information here.
Celvapan Baxter Recommended approval 634858 GlaxoSmithKline Recommended approval H5N1 pandemic influenza vaccine 473074 Nat. Inst. Allergy &Infectious Dis. Phase I/II H6N1-Teal-HK97/AA Nat. Inst. Allergy &Infectious Dis. Phase I VRCAVIDNA036-00-VP Nat. Inst. Allergy & Infectious Dis. Phase I VRCFLUDNA047-00-VP Nat. Inst. Allergy & Infectious Dis. Phase I 428363 MedImmune/National Institutes of Health Phase I 468374 US Department of Health & Human Services Phase I 458108 Novavax/Nat. Inst. Allergy & Infectious Dis.Phase I 477348 Nat. Inst. Allergy & Infectious Dis./Baylor University Phase I 457691 Nat. Inst. Allergy &Infectious Dis. Phase I Source: Thomson Reuters Life Sciences group Disclosure: No positions BiomedReports is not paid or compensated to report news and developments about publicly traded companies. Full disclosure can be read at the bottom of / About Us / Section Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email this
Trackback(0)
Comments (14)
![]()
mkrolczyn
said:
|
|
... I must admit this is an eye opening article. Great job. I hope the decision comes on Tuesday so we can all move on. The suspense is killing me! |
|
Robert C.
said:
|
... I guess the FDA approval just became a bonus play. Now the real money is in the flu vaccine prospects. |
|
SK
said:
|
... EXCELLENT REPORTING!! This is a magnificent article! I've been wracking my brains trying to figure out what the heck happened to stock market w/HEB - made no sense, what so ever! Peter DePalma - FANTASTIC! And to Dr. Carter - good luck, I wish you much success - and more than this, love... for the hope and better health you may soon to deliver to so many others. Cheers! |
|
Rusty J
said:
|
... Great article. Very thoughtful. Go to the site Digg and digg this so we can get it on the front page - 35 million people will see it. |
|
James Mother
said:
|
... Timothy, "always bet the scumbags will stay scumbags", coming from you that means like so much, because you aren't one of the dirtiest scumbags around. |
|
SK
said:
|
... Hey SYKES - You immature moron, you've just plastered ur megloegomaniac trite temper tantrum all over Kingdom Come! Have you NO IDEA how far and fast this article is spreading? ...Just wish I could short YOU come Tuesday! Would make a fortune, no doubt. |
|
LE
said:
|
... This was a fantastic article that I hope gets the visibility that it deserves. It's pretty sad that Tim Sykes Googles his own name each day just to check what people are saying about him. That's so sad. He obviously needs a hug. You can tell he has so much pent-up anger. Poor guy. |
|
jukimol
said:
|
... I guess biomedreports has officially arrived. What is the deal with Sykes' tantrum? What is everyone talking about? Did he post a response somewhere? |
|
SK
said:
|
... SYKES!! Hey MR. TRANSPARENT??! What a fricken chickensheet and now hypocrite! Here's his quote gang, posted it here on BioMedReports in this very comment thread around 11:30A PST: ... "don't you dare say I said short and then buy, in TheStreet.com video, I clearly stated its a probable short going into the 25th, my own video was technical-based and I said the technicals make it a buy but the company's usual failings made me not buy it...considering they did another pipe at discount prices like the scum that they are, I was clearly right, always bet the scumbags will stay scumbags." |
|
SK
said:
|
... P.S. Sykes quote was copied from this comment thread around 11:30A PST on www.StockRants.com Check it out - for further comment on HEB and Sykes! StockRants is a place to go to discuss stock w/out the hype and BS! |
|
SK
said:
|
... OK, my bad - I didn't realize comments here collapsed if voted down here. Sykes comment is visible if you look between Rusty J and James Mother: ...Low rated comment [Show] My apologies - Tim you are indeed transparent and no hypocrite in this case. |
|
Robert C.
said:
|
... Either way, Sykes was caught bashing then recommending the stock. Can't have it both ways, dude. |
|
















