• Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
The Plot Thickens for HEMISPHERx Biopharma PDF  | Print |  E-mail
Written by M.E.Garza   
Friday, 29 May 2009 02:01

“What do we think CFS is?” Dr. William Reeves asked a worldwide audience watching his streaming video presentation from the meeting for the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Advisory Committee (CFSAC) of the Department of Health and Human Services in Washington, DC. on Thursday. “It’s a complex illness, with alterations in complex homeostatic systems. It’s not the result of a single mutation or a single environmental factor. It comes from a combination of many factors: genetics, gender, stressors, immune stressors all interact.”

Reeves is chief of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Chronic Viral Diseases Branch, the man in charge of the government’s top Chronic Fatigue Research program. A few years ago, during a press conference which was set-up in an attempt to sway public opinion and policy, Reeves revealed that CDC researchers had uncovered groundbreaking, scientific results which established that CFS had a "biological basis".  

It was during that day, in late April of 2006, that major television networks and hundreds of newspapers carried the message that many had been waiting to hear. In the eyes of advocates and patients, that day was to forever change the way chronic fatigue syndrome would be conceptualized - by scientists, physicians, and the public. At least, that’s what was supposed to happen. Since that time, Reeves has not minced words about his science or position on the matter. "CFS is quite common," Reeves told Forbes Magazine earlier this year. "It is a real illness. If you have the symptoms of CFS, see a provider. It's not all in your head -- it's not a crock."

Yesterday, Reeves was the ring master of what turned out to be an “Ampligen love-in” at the Health and Human Services event. Not an insignificant fact when you consider that this was the CFSAC's first meeting under the Obama Administration's and that the HHS is at the top of the food chain and rules the FDA, the CDC, The Social Security Administration, National Institute of Health, HRSA, Etc.

As some of you may already know, Ampligen, is an experimental immunomodulatory double stranded RNA drug developed by HEMISPHERx Biopharma (Amex: HEB). In addition, it is the only drug in any pipeline of any pharmaceutical company in the world which aims to become the standard treatment for CFS.

Reeves showed slide after slide with a diagrams and lists. Almost always near the top of those slides were references to HEB and Ampligen. “This is our current model. You see the brain in the middle. Around the brain, stress is involved, traumatic childhood stressors, allostatic load maladaptation to stressors, genes interact with one’s reaction to stress...”

Just then as countless CFS patients and HEMISPHERx Biopharma investors were watching, something went “Boom!”

It was yet another grenade lobbed at the publicly traded company whose stock price had continued inching upwards for yet another day in anticipation of the Food and Drug Administration’s pending decision to approve the drug for widespread use in America.

This time, the pin was pulled by Adam Feuerstein, a graduate from Emory University with a bachelor's degree in political science who serves as the Portfolio Manager, Biotech Select for TheStreet.com. Adam asserted his own opinion- which apparently many mistook for scientific fact. “Ampligen will not be approved.”

KABOOM! The moment TheStreet.com's Hemispherx's CFS Drug Is a Long Shot article hit the wires, the stock’s share price started to take a nose dive.

The thinly disguised opinion piece from a writer without a science or medical degree hit it’s mark with thousands of high-strung investors who began to dump shares en-masse. Many thought Feuerstein might just be right, so they began to sell as quickly as possible. Others thought the FDA had actually rendered a negative ruling against the company because the stock was suddenly dropping in value without any other apparent explanation. Panic had hit the world of Hemispherx share holders once again.

Did Feuerstein blister the company on purpose? Was it all part of a sinister plan orchestrated to sink prices lower so someone could swoop in and salvage their piece for a lower price? Whether it was planned that way or not, at least one big investor did just that to the tune of over 230,000 shares not long after HEB parcels had bottomed at $1.51- down from a day high of $1.76.

Still, it would be expensive, time consuming and difficult to prove a conspiracy like that beyond reasonable doubt and we are not here to crucify Mr. Feuerstein for exercising his constitutionally protected rights.

Certainly, he’s a bright man who is entitled to his own opinion-- even his conclusions didn’t come wrapped up as nicely as they could have to some investors who have since taken to slamming him repeatedly on social media sites and forums across the web.

Like it or not, this subject has become the talk of the biomedical financial sector as many feel his article was not substantiated by enough positive knowledge or proof. Others argue that his research was actually filled with misconceptions, and misplaced scientific information. They’re not alone.

“Adam Feuerstein wouldn’t know good science if it bit him in the ass!”

In a world where CEOs of publicly traded companies make it a point not to get into shouting matches with misled members of the media, I was actually given explicit permission, told I could “record and report everything I’m going to say."

"I’m not going to say too much in direct response, actually. The record can be set straight on this matter by the government themselves. The same people who have already told us this is a serious gene malfunction that costs us north of $90 billion a year in lost wages and productivity not to mention social security benefits.”

Yes, Dr. William A. Carter, CEO and Chairman of the Board of HEMISPHERx Biopharma was making it abundantly clear to me that an exposed nerve had just been pricked – again. This is the same man who has been accused of everything from not caring about his own company’s investors to selling snake oil. He’s also the brilliant mind who has never given up on Ampligen and who genuinely seems driven to help those who have to live with CFS and the stigmas associated with it.

“It sounds like those guys are living twenty years behind in time,” continued Dr. Carter, as he referred to Feuerstein’s assertion that “CFS, a poorly understood disease with no known cause...”

Had Feuerstein really not gotten the memo about the scientific community’s findings in 2006 or did he simply choose to ignore them?

“This is a disease that destroys lives,” said an impassioned Dr. Carter. “It costs people their jobs, their marriages- as their frustrated spouses walk out on them. In some cases it even costs them their very lives due to suicide and catastrophic heart failure. Our drug helps so many of these very sick, suffering people. There is ample peer reviewed data and proof of that, yet they choose to ignore it.

“Perhaps the writers at TheStreet.com are unaware that for several years now, the FDA has given people suffering with CFS the right to use Ampligen for emergency (compassionate) use. “

Indeed, the company is authorized by the FDA and has a "promising'' designation by the Agency on Health Research Quality (AHRQ) emergency treatment, which means HEMISPHERx can charge patients up to $20K a year for treatments. “That’s a price most health insurance companies actually prefer to pay when compared to the high costs of misdiagnosis, MRIs, CAT scans and even surgeries that occur from time to time when patients suffering from the illness show up at hospital emergency rooms seeking help,” explained Dr. Carter. “In order for us to get that designation, the government had to establish that CFS was, indeed, a very serious disease. Second, the FDA had to be shown that there was not any other adequate treatment and perhaps most importantly, Ampligen had to be safe to administer. That is one thing that has never been withdrawn or questioned by them. “

In fact, one insider tells us that in the early days of it’s use under the program, the FDA required the company to submit safety reports every month. They did so every month for 150 months. In fact, the reports were delivered with such positive data and accuracy that eventually a top administrator at federal agency grew tired of reading them. He told them to stop.

The CDC, as represented during Thursday’s presentation, has made important commitments to HEMISPHERx when I comes to CFS. “We’re talking to them two to three times a week as we compare protocols and treatments,” explains Dr. Carter. “Because they have vast resources, they have been prolific in the publication of research about the disease. They’ve published about the severity of the gene malfunction. This is a major medical research organization in the world and they recognize that we are leaders in the field of CFS.

“You can’t tell me they’re not aware of that... I don’t know what the agenda is at TheStreet.Com, but those guys may as well start selling off their 401K’s because they apparently know very little about investing. Not only do they manipulate the facts- they conspicuously don't talk about our collaborations and data. “

The same drug used for CFS has now taken center stage in the fight against so called swine flu (H1N1). The company has made headlines in recent days as it has moved full force into collaboration with health ministries and scientists in Japan. In fact, BiomedReports has learned that the company is officially on the fast track to making some substantial sales of its products to Japan. Purchases that will initially treat as many as 30 million Japanese military and paramedic personnel may be announced soon. When the orders come, research indicates that first year sales figures for Ampligen as a vaccine booster may actually dwarf sales for Ampligen as a treatment for CFS. That trend, as currently projected, would continue for at least the first two years.

“The highest level of the Japanese government and public medical community is now focused exclusively on our product,” says Carter. “They stopped working on all other adjuvants (boosters) and are only working with this one because they’ve found that it enhances the vaccines by 100 fold.”

In so called animal (monkey) models, all of the sickest animals' lives have been saved after researchers added a little Ampligen to the administered novel influenza vaccines. This has all been reviewed by the Japanese National Institutes of Health with great attention since the H1N1 virus has been spreading in that part of the world swiftly and threatens to breakout even further into Asia.

“Drug safety is the number one priority in Japan,” explains Dr. Carter. “Research there is excellent and their scientists have an outstanding historical safety record.Our research and results are independently verifiable, and internationally recognized.”

Another tremendous platform in the influenza space is Hemispherx’s flagship product, Alferon which is already approved by the FDA.

“That’s already passed FDA muster,” says Dr. Carter. “Furthermore, It’s a fully natural interferon- all others are manipulated. That makes it the most effective interferon available. It can stop the SARS coronavirus, Avian Influenza (H5N1) and we have a treatment program with plenty of this drug already stockpiled.”

No report on today’s events would be complete without shedding light on some of the conspiracy theories surrounding the FDA decision on Ampligen.

The company already knows something and they’re just not telling us.

Actually, they don’t. They know as much as you do.

The new FDA commissioner’s husband is insider trading with shares of HEB and other biomedical stocks.

Where can one go to start to prove something like that- even if true?

The wording on the press release about the delay was carefully crafted by lawyers at HEB.
No, actually it was communicated to them pretty much verbatim by officials at the FDA.

Yes, as those conspiracy theories go, perhaps the most deeply rooted ones can be found around the disclosure made earlier in the week by HEB. In it, the company informed the market that the FDA had advised the company of a possible delay that might require up to 1-2 additional weeks to take action beyond the scheduled action date on the New Drug Application for Ampligen.

“Hemispherx's statement makes no sense because the FDA's Ampligen review is either delayed or it isn't.” wrote Feurerstein in his controversial article. “With the clock now ticking past the scheduled May 25 approval-decision date, the review is clearly delayed, so perhaps it's incumbent upon Hemispherx to provide a better explanation.”

Actually, it’s probably incumbent on the FDA to do so. They were the ones who picked up the phone and gave that very same explanation to Hemispherx officials. There is a game of musical chairs going on at the administration these days. Not only is there a new commissioner, there is also a new senior associate commissioner and some of the people working in the molecular division have been affected as well.

As one insider told me, “PDUFA (Prescription Drug User Fee Act) dates are like the date the doctor gives you when you’re pregnant. They’re a pretty good guess, but the baby could decide to come sooner or later. You have no real control.”

In this case, anyone can speculate and look for signs one way or the other, but the truth is that companies who are trying to get drugs approved spend a great deal of time, energy and millions of dollars meeting the strictest of requirements- and that's simply to submit an application. This time, at least, Hemispherix has done the best job they feel they could. All of their paperwork, studies and data were handed over and they even went as far as to voluntarily submit additional data which pushed their original PDUFA date in February back three months.

“Sure, we’ve probably been slow,” says Dr. Carter when asked about Ampligen’s long, multi-decade, journey to this point. “Sometimes we didn’t have enough money, we were also shooting in the dark for the most part and you’ve got to remember that when it comes to CFS, even the CDC is a ‘Johnny come lately.” The real progress in this disease has been recent.”

There are some things we do know as we await the fateful decision from the FDA- and still some things we don’t. I’m told that at least one very well respected medical publication will be publishing an article submitted by the company less than 48 hours ago. We’re told that when the yet to be publicly disclosed (“it’s a household name”) medical review journal releases the data shortly, it will be impressive.

In addition, the publishers of The Pink Sheet- a comprehensive publication for and about the pharmaceutical industry- have informed the company that all of their extensive research and findings has led them to one conclusion: “Ampligen is poised to become the first drug approved for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.”

Adam Feurerstein, as he'll be happy to tell you, disagrees.

We’ll soon see who was right.

 

Disclosure: No positions




BiomedReports is not paid or compensated to report news and developments about publicly traded companies. Full disclosure can be read at the bottom of / About Us / Section

Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Digg! Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Google! Live! Facebook! Technorati! StumbleUpon! MySpace! Yahoo!
Trackback(0)
Comments (42)add comment

M.E. Garza said:

...
For those of you interested in learning more about the presentation at the CFSAC, I invite you to this page:

http://www.prohealth.com/me-cfs/blog/boardDetail.cfm?id=1351213
 
May 29, 2009
Votes: +1

Jmars said:

...
No that is journalism at it's best. Very diplomatically done.
 
May 29, 2009
Votes: +5

Matt Kelly said:

...
Well done Mr. Garza, well done. Stating facts in an article is very novel, perhaps some colleagues that we know would benefit from using similar logic.
 
May 29, 2009
Votes: +5

NS said:

...
Well written up, at least, to the point rebuttals. but it is nice to see you take a shot at AF's credentials. However, if someone has been in the industry for several years, they could end up learning a lot. So one need not be a biology graduate.
 
May 29, 2009
Votes: -1

Adriant Alexander said:

...
Thanks Garza! That was the best article thus far. By the way, Yahoo has removed the Street.com article. I bet these guys are under investigation. Your article is in great circulation. I wish yahoo would post it.
 
May 29, 2009
Votes: +3

Tarriance said:

...
Thank you for giving clarity and factual information. The article written by Adam from the Street.com was clearly designed to sow doubt and confusion. In particular, a sentence eluding to having failed certain results, but ironically he provided a link which clearly shows he revised the verbiage to mislead investors... Why? Who is he helping? Certainly not those who suffer from CFS!
 
May 29, 2009
Votes: +3

the otter way said:

...
Thank you for the hope again.... Words can create wonder and amaze, or can destroy the dreams of so many.... This I believe is fair and responsible writing....
 
May 29, 2009
Votes: +3

LE said:

...
Hoorah sir, hoorah!
 
May 29, 2009
Votes: +2

Ndou said:

...
Yet, it was POWERFUL!

It was as powerful as his post blasting CTIC 10 days ago, powerful
not because of its strong logic and well researched facts. No, to the
contrary. It was powerful because it was a skillful article that
employed a common logical fallacy that appeals to the emotions, fears
and prejudices of investors.

Well, the reason I mentioned that article and his reaction to the
reaction of the CTIC investors is because that was a prelude to what
happened yesterday. He posted an article about HEB and its drug. He
followed the same style of reasoning, ad-hoc reasoning that relied
mostly on cliches and unverifiable so-called facts. In fact, he even
admitted that he came up with some of the side-effects of the drug.
Read his article and you'll see that toward the end of his article.
Most importantly, he instigated the fear of many investors and played
wrecklessly with their financial future. This is awful.

If he did, indeed, call HEB, whom did he call? What's the name and
number? At what time did he call? He simply complained that they
didn't call him back. Well, if that's the case, I do not exactly
blame
HEB. After all, HEB did call John, our discussion partner, on this
board. And what Diana said to John was of some interest to me and to
many of you, I am sure.

Adam Feuerstein stated that the FDA 1-2 week postponement of the
decision was the work of manipulation by HEB. May be! Be he doesn't
know that for sure. Instead, he insinuated that HEB was creating that
charade for a reason, but he stopped short of saying what that reason
is. Why would HEB do that? One could only think of negative reasons.
Well, it seems that Adam Feuerstein's entire argument was to pain HEB
quite negatively.

So, that doesn't provide me any comfort any more than Adam
Feuerstein's reasoning doesn't give me any anxiety over it either.

And if Adam Feuerstein is so concerned about the possible fraud by
HEB, all he had to do was wait for a couple of weeks to uncover the
"fraud!" Well, he did not. It seemed that he was more anxious than
anyone else to push that article out of the door. Frankly, I am
beginning to suspect that he has an ulterior motive behind that, but
before indulging myself into that thought. I will tell you something
Diana (from HEB) told John.

Diana said that literally some institutional investors have
explicitly
said to HEB that the reason they haven't invested in HEB yet is
because this has gone on for 30 years almost, and that (THIS IS THE
SHOCKING PART) they would rather buy shares from HEB after the
approval even if the share price is very expensive and guarantee that
the stock has a product in the market rather than take a risk now
even
if it were for a cheap price.

Now, the reason that piece of information is important to a lot of us
is because it really answers the question that many of us have about
why CTIC, HEB and many other such stocks are not heavily invested by
institutions. Their agenda is quite different than the average
individual investor who is in a relatively higher state of
desperation
than those well established, financially sound institutions. They do
not mind paying $12 per share because what they will benefit from
isn't to turn around and sell it to someone else for a higher price.
No! They would get benefit from the company in terms of revenue and
profit. Now, remember, we did have this discussion on the CTIC board
a
while ago and we talked about how it is not my goal to sell all of my
shares but rather to keep a great deal of those shares if the company
shows signs of financial recover and management health.

Until now, I still have some doubts about HEB's chances of approval
for its drug, but I do have a lot more confidence than doubt. The
reason being the very fact that just because a drug has been rejected
in the past, it doesn't mean it will continue to get rejected. After
all, there is a reason why it is proposed again. There is a reason
there have been further studies. There are some questions about the
safety, that is true. One cannot just live in denial. There are some
questions and concerns for which we still do not have answers, but
that does not mean we should just accept any answer out of fear. We
jumped on HEB knowing very well that there are some unknowns and that
there is no certainty. So, why did Adam Feuerstein suddenly change
the
picture.

Adam Feuerstein did not propose or uncover anything new. In fact, he
simply posted some lies and psuedo facts. We are still where we were
two days ago, the same concerns, the same unanswered questions, and
the same probability of approval. The only difference is that now we
have the added nuisance of Adam Feuerstein, otherwise known as the
tomato head. Yes, anyone who objects to that title, raise your head
and I will throw a tomato on you. HAHAHA.

Nour (please check my profile to verify that I have posts in April,
to
verify the authenticity of this poster. No APRIL posts means it's an
impostor)
 
May 29, 2009
Votes: +5

David H Boyle said:

...
Great article ... thanks!
 
May 29, 2009
Votes: +1

Han Jit said:

...
well said. I'm waiting for Adam to respond to this, hopefully with proper facts and not blowing it with rumours,conspiracy theories and his political science mojo.
 
May 29, 2009
Votes: +1

Milan Blecha said:

...
Feuerstein is definitely not an expert in medical field, but I am. I have PhD in pharmaceutical science, I am a cancer researcher for 10 years with a significant experience with clinical trials. And I fully agree with the bachelor of political science that there is a lot of suspicious inconsistency in Hemisperx reporting their clinical trial data. Why there is no reaction to this Feuerstein accussations? Especially when it was the gist of Feuerstein s bashing?
 
May 29, 2009
Votes: -2

Rusty J said:

...
Adam's just not that bright. What probably happened is some hedge fund or day trader manipulated him. Just like his boss Jim Cramer use to do. Adam was the vehicle to start the rumor and he didn't even realized he was used and the info wasn't accurate. He just didn't do his homework. You could tell when you looked at the data he referenced.

M.E. Garza - I would be curious if there was a reasonable explanation for the difference in data over the three press releases that Adam references. That seems to be the one piece that wasn't addressed.
 
May 29, 2009
Votes: +1

DOA said:

...
This is my new source from now on for educated Bio stock info. Thank You!
 
May 29, 2009
Votes: +1

Big Daddy said:

...
Great article Garza!
 
May 29, 2009
Votes: +1

giterdnn said:

...
Mr.Garza, Thanks for the great article, Adam F. I dont have anything good to say about his opinon,"reasearch" or article, so I wont say anything at all. BUT I do find it interesting that after his negative article, the stock fell and shortly there after "someone" bought and sold and re bought 231K of HEB at a large discount due to AF article, HMM sounds like GREED to me.
 
May 29, 2009
Votes: +0

Michael Vlaicu said:

...
A true masterpiece!
 
May 29, 2009
Votes: +1

Guddu said:

...
Very nice article.
A.F. does not have any biomedical academic background. He holds BS in political science...and now trying to become a biotech expert. There is a big difference in these two fields. He knows nothing about biomedical research. I suggest all to ignore his so-called opinion about biotech stocks.
 
May 29, 2009
Votes: +0

sagrock said:

...
LOve YOuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu Garza...HOpe your words will come true
 
May 29, 2009
Votes: +3

Miguel said:

...
Freaking-a-diddy-bag!
 
May 29, 2009
Votes: -1

Suzanne said:

...
Any thoughts on the recently published article (Vaccine. 2009 May 26;27(25-26):3401-4. Epub 2009 Feb 5) on ampligen stating that it may be useful an an adjuvant therapy in cancer treatment?
 
May 29, 2009
Votes: -1

Sri said:

...
Excellent journal...great insight....can anybody tell me the name of the medical journal...thanks in advance
 
May 29, 2009
Votes: -1

P V said:

...
I feel sorry for CFS patients who have to spend more money to get Ampligen doses. If it gets approved, this will cover in their insurance.
I hope it gets approved this time.
 
May 29, 2009
Votes: +0

trjoe said:

...
Excellent Article..Keep up the great work
 
May 29, 2009
Votes: +0

Robert said:

...
I feel sorry for A.F., as I am certain Ampligen will get approved and the poor sap will have to watch his back for some disgruntled investor who missed out on the year's biggest FDA approval. If I were him, I would go into protective custody.
 
May 29, 2009
Votes: -2

Wm. Tim Skalla said:

...
If not a christian man, Robert could be talking about me as I let 12k of HEB go way too cheap, any lawyers out there? Email me.
 
May 29, 2009
Votes: -1

rgard32 said:

...
I own stock in HEB and im NOT bashing... but i do have 1 question

why did the data change over the years?? I didnt see that in your response??? thank you in advance
 
May 29, 2009
Votes: +3

bricconcello said:

...
OK, now understand, you guys trust company presentations and company announcements... yeah... no idea of what serious scientific peer-reviewed papers, published in trusted journals are, I guess... in fact there is NO recent published controlled evidence that this "treatment for CFS" fits any criteria FDA would rely upon... not to mention a molecular rationale by which a TLR3 agonist would benefit CFS-affected cells... at least no more than what ginseng would be expected to do... unfortunately for the patients, until a clear druggable target is identified is CFS, there ain't gonna be no meaningful drug... so, do not mislead patiens with false expectations, fund serious research on CFS instead!
 
May 29, 2009
Votes: -4

Ndou said:

...
The 13 day SMA for HEB is above the 50 day sma and this indicates a bullish trend!
 
May 29, 2009
Votes: -1

Ndou said:

...
NEW CONFERENCE CALL WITH HEB'S CEO:

http://www.stockshaven.com/

Listen to it!
 
May 29, 2009
Votes: +0

M.E. Garza said:

...
Thank you all for the comments, both good and bad.

Looks like the stock bounced back today and is showing some very good technicals, so I'm happy for all you longs out there.

If anyone wants to read the PINK SHEET article that was discussed towards the end of my article, someone sent me a link to it so I'll share it with all of you:

http://drop.io/ctic888
 
May 29, 2009
Votes: +1

The Stig said:

May 29, 2009
Votes: +3

yashanti said:

...
I think I'll just follow Cranshire Capital around.

The buy 8% of Orchid Cellmark in Jan,07, it goes up 100% by April, they put 15mil into CTIC, it shoots up, and yesterday they buy 5 million shares for HEB.

We're in good company.

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/946644/000095013709004159/0000950137-09-004159-index.htm

 
May 30, 2009
Votes: +1

Not invested and do not have CFS said:

...
A new theory comming out of the CFS conference. According to Dr. de Meirleir, a major cause of ME/CFS is a high level of the chemical hydrogen sulfide (H2S). H2S can build up after antibiotic use, salmonella infection, or too much mercury exposure. How would Ampligen fit into this new theory. Could this finding have been why the FDA delayed the approval of this drug. The FDA spokesman at the CDC CFS conference said "as I have said many times before, one of the complexities of developing new drugs for cfs is that we don't have any invitro or any animal models that will allow us to select the products that would be potentally effective for this condition. In other deseases there are models that allow companies to select models that would be worth while to be evaluated in those conditions and I think that CFS really challanges us because we don't really have any modern model that allows us to select the products that would be potentially effective for this condition." As I read more about Ampligen and CFS I get more confused. Right now I am courious if you still feel the same way about Ampligen and the need to approve this drug?
 
May 30, 2009
Votes: +2

Sam said:

...
I will wait for the approval and hope for the best anytime this week we should get a response from the FDA. I feel like Im a football game, GO HEB.. GO HEB.....yah yahh
 
May 30, 2009
Votes: +0

M.E.Garza said:

...
Regarding the "A new theory comming out of the CFS conference"...

Thanks for posting that. It's very interesting.
I'll see what I can find out.
 
May 31, 2009
Votes: +1

Not invested and do not have CFS said:

...
The correct link to the pink sheet: http://www.willstar.net/downloads/ThePinkSheet.pdf

I have a girlfriend that was on Ampligen and she was taken off of it. The relationship has since gone through very hard times. I love her, however, I don't think I can keep this up much longer. I am sorry to say this but I think its time to move on with my life. I was hoping Ampligen could have changed this.
 
May 31, 2009
Votes: +0

M.E.Garza said:

...
From: http://www.upi.com/Health_News...243789260/

WASHINGTON, May 31 (UPI) -- This year's swine flu outbreak refuted many of the predictions about how the next large-scale flu pandemic would originate and spread, experts say.

The world's medical community had based much of their pandemic planning on the 2004 H5N1 "bird flu" outbreak in Southeast Asia, which proved to be a poor model for predicting how the latest novel flu strain, H1N1, would play out, The Washington Post reported Sunday.

In planning to cope with future pandemics, experts after 2004 wrongly assumed it would be an avian flu strain. They also assumed that, like H5N1, it would be deadly in 60 percent of those who caught it, instead of the less than 1 percent mortality rate of the H1N1 virus.

"Everyone was thinking about H5N1 and the possibility that we would be in for partial global population collapse," influenza expert David Fedson told the newspaper. "We never addressed severity, because we knew it would be severe. And now we have this funny virus coming out of pigs."

The consequences were that the world was largely unprepared for the swine flu virus that emerged despite five years and hundreds of millions of dollars spent on getting ready, the Post said.
 
June 01, 2009
Votes: +0

Jerry said:

...
The Hemispherx Story

http://www.asensio.com/Reports/WarStoriesHemispherx.aspx
 
June 03, 2009
Votes: +1

Honest Ed said:

...
Report Feinstein and his manipulation of stocks.. along with ties to shorters (check out the number of shorts immediately before release of his articles)

SEC really need to look into the effect his "reports" have on the market.. and who profits off them:

http://www.sec.gov/complaint.shtml
 
June 05, 2009
Votes: +0

Truth Seeker said:

...
Check out this blogpost on the HEB controverst
http://pigfluinfo.blogspot.com...2009.html
 
June 06, 2009
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
Last Updated on Friday, 05 June 2009 11:38
 

Sign Up For Phone Alerts