• Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Investors Wondering Why Cel-Sci Has Quietly Amended Previously Filed Paperwork PDF  | Print |  E-mail
Written by M.E.Garza   
Wednesday, 11 November 2009 00:00

Is the management at CEL-SCI Corporation (AMEX:CVM) signaling that something big is coming?

In mid September, on the same day that CEL-SCI Corporation (AMEX:CVM) announced that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had indicated that the company could proceed with its first clinical trial to evaluate the effect of its investigational LEAPS-H1N1 treatment on the white blood cells of hospitalized H1N1 patients, CEL-SCI Corporation also announced plans to raise $20 Million in Registered Direct Offering. Shares showed some resiliency after investors were told that the net proceeds from the offering would be used to commence a pivotal Phase III clinical trial with its cancer drug Multikine and that the company would rapidly take its new LEAPS - H1N1 compound into human studies for the treatment of hospitalized H1N1 patients.

After the market closed on Tuesday, investors learned that the company had filed an "amended" Form S-3 with the SEC. The form appears to be part of a $30 million bump to a previously filed "shelf offering" that had just been filed with the SEC two weeks ago, on October 30th.

In that original filing, the company had disclosed that they were looking to raise only $10 million. The total now is $40 million. Was there a miscalculation? Did something unforeseen develop at the recent vaccine conference in D.C.?

While the filing has impacted the shares negatively over the last couple of days, the company may not even be planning to take advantage of the new shelf immediately.

These types of filings, while not usually publicized, give informed investors significant information regarding the securities offered, and are basically designed to help alert investors ahead of any sudden moves.

Still, one is left to wonder. Is this a "tell?" Especially given the odd timing of the filing.

One day prior to the amendment, the company had reported from the big conference in Washington that their L.E.A.P.S. platform had shown the ability to modify immune response. Those findings based on studies conducted by Dr. Kenneth S. Rosenthal, Professor of Immunology and Microbiology of Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine and Pharmacy, in collaboration with scientists at the Cleveland Clinic were supportive of the role that the technology might play in the treatment of H1N1 hospitalized patients.

That news, coupled with a release two days earlier that an Institutional Review Board of The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (Johns Hopkins) had given clearance for the company's H1N1 clinical study to proceed. The news boosted credibility among investors and basically let them know that CEL-SCI had indeed been working diligently with their CRO and Johns Hopkins to actively prepare submissions to the FDA.

The aim, as explained by company officials in a released statement, is to move ahead "in the fastest and most effective way" towards clinical trials going forward for this unique investigational treatment. That sent shares up 50% during back-to-back sessions on Friday and Monday.

Then came the new amended filing.

Here is what we do know:

Some time in the next two years (as allowed by the SEC), Cel-Sci can offer and sell up to $40 million of the securities described in the registration statement. The terms of any future offering would be established at the time of the offering and would be subject to market conditions and approval by the company’s board of directors.

So while the Company doesn't appear to have any immediate plans to use the shelf registration statement, this filing may allow CEL-SCI to offer and sell securities on an expedited basis if market opportunities present themselves and that prospect has left investors wondering if some kind of news, event or even partnership is in the works.

We know that the company has several pending news items including, but not limited to:

1- The validation of its newly completed state-of-the-art facility in Maryland which it expects to utilize to launch aseptic filling for stem cell produced therapies and other biological products. In addition to serving as the "home base" for manufacturing Multikine® going forward, the facility could also bring substantial revenue to the company if they decide to lease it to other companies on a per-hour or per-day basis.

2- The official announcement that the long awaited global Phase III trials for Multikine®- which is being readied as a cancer vaccine in advanced primary head and neck cancer- have begun.

3- An announcement- or series of announcements- regarding CEL-SCI's prevention and treatment for H1N1 swine flu using their L.E.A.P.S. technology platform. Those announcements could include the results of clinical human blood tests, FDA designation or status changes for the H1N1 treatment. Another expedited trial announcement or change of clinical process itself . After this past weekend's hearing in front of congress, where the nation's top health officials were criticized for not investing more into U.S. based flu prevention platforms and being "ill-prepared" to deal with the pandemic flu- as evidenced by the late delivery of vaccines, it's not even far fetched to think that some kind of federal funding for the L.E.A.P.S. H1N1 program (similar to the funding seen for BioCryst's (NASDAQ:BCRX)  Peramavir) could come into play.

Take a look at that company's stock performance during the last two months. Impressive. Especially given the criticism that Peramavir has gotten in the press.

Like Tamiflu and Relenza, Peramavir is a neuraminidase inhibitor and the problem with neuraminidase blocking is that there are  human genes that utilize neuraminidase for normal and healthy cell function (NEU1, NEU2, NEU3, NEU4). Critics of the drug argue that any neuraminidase blocking drug runs the risk of interfering with general communication needed for healthy cell function. The L.E.A.P.S. platform works completely differently and is intended to enable stimulation of the specifically-needed immune responses, while avoiding the administration of regions of H1N1, and other viruses, which may exacerbate the problem of cytokine storm, which scientists believe may be involved in the death of these H1N1 patients.

"What's promising is LEAPS immunogen's ability to activate the desired immune response without generating pro-inflammatory responses, which should make for inherently safe vaccines," According to Melly Alazraki of AOL's Daily Finance which published a story about researchers who are rushing to build better defenses against H1N1 on Wednesday.

Speculation. All of it. Yet it fuels the market and particularly stocks like CVM, who have so much ammo in their trunk.

On the other side of the coin, critics pounce on CEl-SCI's possible motives and cry "Dilution!"

"We just hope the company gives some of it's investors a chance to actually make money on good news, instead of simply raising money and keeping that entirely for themselves," says one long time investor in the company. "I'm not happy about the latest filing and it makes me wonder why they're going to go after more money. After all, didn't the company just announce that they had enough money to finally start Phase III trials for Multikine and to provide funding for their H1N1 program the last time they raised money?"

As explained so clearly in Investopedia, "sometimes current market conditions are not favorable for a specific firm to issue a public offering. For example, suppose the housing market is heading toward a dramatic decline. In this case, it may not be a good time for a home builder to come out with its second offering, as many investors will be pessimistic about companies working in that sector. By using shelf registration, the firm can fulfill all registration-related procedures beforehand and go to market quickly when conditions become more favorable."

After cruisin' the message boards, one reader sent me this comment by a poster who goes by the name xji590. Apparently, his take has attaracted quite a bit of attention from the longs.

"The shelf is an opportunistic move," he writes. "It is there in case someone comes along willing to buy a major block of shares at a price that the company thinks is reasonable. But clearly he needs to wait to utilize the shares made available through this shelf until he can minimize dilution. They are well capitalize right now, however, the H1N1 opportunity has thrust upon the company cash flow requirements, I'm sure, that were not anticipated a year ago, or even six months ago. Geert (Kersten, the CEO) knows that his cash flow model has changed, and needs to put the company in a position, through the shelf, to raise additional working capital should the company need to do that... I love seeing the company going out with a bold statement like this shelf offering... They have confidence. So what are they confident in? That's the $60 thousand dollar question... If they just need cash, Geert would go out with a shelf grabbing $2M, $5M maybe even $10M... But $40M??? That's a big shelf for CVM. That conveys management confidence."

Shares closed down only slightly for the second day in a row.

I'd venture to say that given all the drama and attention, what comes next will definitely be interesting.

 

Disclosure: Long CVM




BiomedReports is not paid or compensated to report news and developments about publicly traded companies. Full disclosure can be read at the bottom of / About Us / Section

Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Digg! Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Google! Live! Facebook! Technorati! StumbleUpon! MySpace! Yahoo!
Trackback(0)
Comments (10)add comment

pcstock_cvm said:

...
Hi M.E.Garza,

It is great information. Since you refer to Melly Alazraki's story, can you provide more info about her credentials? I hope you can continue to cover CVM when there is any unusual price movements. I also follow HEB and hope you can cover/explain the HEB's situation since you have covered it extensively before.



 
November 11, 2009
Votes: +0

Duaine Swarthout said:

...
This company, along with these crooked reporters, are all con artists,. after months of reading this crap, anyone would have to be a complete sucker to touch this stock
 
November 11, 2009
Votes: +0

hung said:

...
I love this story. Thank for the insight and I been long for 3 months. I hope someday this stock can get the attention from the FDA and also Merk. I think their might be a take over in a near future because this will be a tight squeeze for the short.
 
November 11, 2009
Votes: +1

hung said:

...
I hope their a tight squeeze for the naked short. Because someday some big pharma going to buy cvm for the potential pipe lines.
 
November 11, 2009
Votes: +1

Don Negri said:

...
Hope to see you all at the finish line, I will be the one with the big smile while hopefully cashing in a big check
 
November 11, 2009
Votes: +1

brian butler said:

...
What disturbs me is what's within the shelf filing. Specifically, the number of shares that might be required to issue to cover outstanding warrants and options (at $0.20/share). From what I can tell, this could double the number of outstanding shares, not including the issues with Iriquois. Add that to the 40 million, and the dilution is more than substantial.
 
November 11, 2009
Votes: +0

mtino said:

...
i feel this stock is a success but its a high risk stock cause u dont really no wheather or not this sh*t they say is actually true.. i own it at 44 cents so im holding for now but its been a great buy on the pullbacks it always pops so buy when it dips sell on the pop check the charts
 
November 11, 2009
Votes: +0

Daniel furlong said:

...
very interesting, i did notice something, they filed the shelf after the law suit was filled for 30 million and 90 million punitive, they said they had plenty of money raised a month ago for there ph 3 trials, plus whats up with this selling warrent's to byron pharma for 22 cents a share 4 days after they became a company, that seems so shady of cvm dealing with a company with no history or any public information, im really surprised the SEC didnt suspend there stock yet for that one.
 
November 12, 2009
Votes: +0

RCM said:

...
Regarding dilution:

1. If you look at many of the smaller biotech companies who have given away 90% or more of their profits (on specific compounds having one or more indications) to their big pharma partners and you compare that with Cel-Sci whose so called "diulution" is about raising efficient amounts capital to further their science, you see that they have clearly not "given away the store." To me, anyway, this is prudent.

While the math may appear "tricky," it can be done. As it stands now I calculate that outstanding shares could go as high as 250mm -- doesn't include the new money. Please correct me if I am wrong.
 
November 12, 2009
Votes: +0

friedrich said:

...
I think that is a promissing company.
We have a lot of work here and if the results of phase III of multikind are positves, there will be many people fun because a real nightmare will be finished. It's wortth.

Friedrich
 
November 13, 2009
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
Last Updated on Thursday, 12 November 2009 01:17
 

Sign Up For Phone Alerts