| Investors Wondering Why Cel-Sci Has Quietly Amended Previously Filed Paperwork | | Print | |
| Written by M.E.Garza | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Wednesday, 11 November 2009 00:00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
After the market closed on Tuesday, investors learned that the company had filed an "amended" Form S-3 with the SEC. The form appears to be part of a $30 million bump to a previously filed "shelf offering" that had just been filed with the SEC two weeks ago, on October 30th. In that original filing, the company had disclosed that they were looking to raise only $10 million. The total now is $40 million. Was there a miscalculation? Did something unforeseen develop at the recent vaccine conference in D.C.? That news, coupled with a release two days earlier that an Institutional Review Board of The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (Johns Hopkins) had given clearance for the company's H1N1 clinical study to proceed. The news boosted credibility among investors and basically let them know that CEL-SCI had indeed been working diligently with their CRO and Johns Hopkins to actively prepare submissions to the FDA. The aim, as explained by company officials in a released statement, is to move ahead "in the fastest and most effective way" towards clinical trials going forward for this unique investigational treatment. That sent shares up 50% during back-to-back sessions on Friday and Monday. Like Tamiflu and Relenza, Peramavir is a neuraminidase inhibitor and the problem with neuraminidase blocking is that there are human genes that utilize neuraminidase for normal and healthy cell function (NEU1, NEU2, NEU3, NEU4). Critics of the drug argue that any neuraminidase blocking drug runs the risk of interfering with general communication needed for healthy cell function. The L.E.A.P.S. platform works completely differently and is intended to enable stimulation of the specifically-needed immune responses, while avoiding the administration of regions of H1N1, and other viruses, which may exacerbate the problem of cytokine storm, which scientists believe may be involved in the death of these H1N1 patients. Speculation. All of it. Yet it fuels the market and particularly stocks like CVM, who have so much ammo in their trunk. As explained so clearly in Investopedia, "sometimes current market conditions are not favorable for a specific firm to issue a public offering. For example, suppose the housing market is heading toward a dramatic decline. In this case, it may not be a good time for a home builder to come out with its second offering, as many investors will be pessimistic about companies working in that sector. By using shelf registration, the firm can fulfill all registration-related procedures beforehand and go to market quickly when conditions become more favorable." After cruisin' the message boards, one reader sent me this comment by a poster who goes by the name xji590. Apparently, his take has attaracted quite a bit of attention from the longs. "The shelf is an opportunistic move," he writes. "It is there in case someone comes along willing to buy a major block of shares at a price that the company thinks is reasonable. But clearly he needs to wait to utilize the shares made available through this shelf until he can minimize dilution. They are well capitalize right now, however, the H1N1 opportunity has thrust upon the company cash flow requirements, I'm sure, that were not anticipated a year ago, or even six months ago. Geert (Kersten, the CEO) knows that his cash flow model has changed, and needs to put the company in a position, through the shelf, to raise additional working capital should the company need to do that... I love seeing the company going out with a bold statement like this shelf offering... They have confidence. So what are they confident in? That's the $60 thousand dollar question... If they just need cash, Geert would go out with a shelf grabbing $2M, $5M maybe even $10M... But $40M??? That's a big shelf for CVM. That conveys management confidence." Shares closed down only slightly for the second day in a row. I'd venture to say that given all the drama and attention, what comes next will definitely be interesting.
Disclosure: Long CVM BiomedReports is not paid or compensated to report news and developments about publicly traded companies. Full disclosure can be read at the bottom of / About Us / Section Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email this
Trackback(0)
Comments (10)
![]()
pcstock_cvm
said:
|
|
... Hi M.E.Garza, It is great information. Since you refer to Melly Alazraki's story, can you provide more info about her credentials? I hope you can continue to cover CVM when there is any unusual price movements. I also follow HEB and hope you can cover/explain the HEB's situation since you have covered it extensively before. |
|
Duaine Swarthout
said:
|
... This company, along with these crooked reporters, are all con artists,. after months of reading this crap, anyone would have to be a complete sucker to touch this stock |
|
hung
said:
|
... I love this story. Thank for the insight and I been long for 3 months. I hope someday this stock can get the attention from the FDA and also Merk. I think their might be a take over in a near future because this will be a tight squeeze for the short. |
|
hung
said:
|
... I hope their a tight squeeze for the naked short. Because someday some big pharma going to buy cvm for the potential pipe lines. |
|
Don Negri
said:
|
... Hope to see you all at the finish line, I will be the one with the big smile while hopefully cashing in a big check |
|
brian butler
said:
|
... What disturbs me is what's within the shelf filing. Specifically, the number of shares that might be required to issue to cover outstanding warrants and options (at $0.20/share). From what I can tell, this could double the number of outstanding shares, not including the issues with Iriquois. Add that to the 40 million, and the dilution is more than substantial. |
|
mtino
said:
|
... i feel this stock is a success but its a high risk stock cause u dont really no wheather or not this sh*t they say is actually true.. i own it at 44 cents so im holding for now but its been a great buy on the pullbacks it always pops so buy when it dips sell on the pop check the charts |
|
Daniel furlong
said:
|
... very interesting, i did notice something, they filed the shelf after the law suit was filled for 30 million and 90 million punitive, they said they had plenty of money raised a month ago for there ph 3 trials, plus whats up with this selling warrent's to byron pharma for 22 cents a share 4 days after they became a company, that seems so shady of cvm dealing with a company with no history or any public information, im really surprised the SEC didnt suspend there stock yet for that one. |
|
RCM
said:
|
... Regarding dilution: 1. If you look at many of the smaller biotech companies who have given away 90% or more of their profits (on specific compounds having one or more indications) to their big pharma partners and you compare that with Cel-Sci whose so called "diulution" is about raising efficient amounts capital to further their science, you see that they have clearly not "given away the store." To me, anyway, this is prudent. While the math may appear "tricky," it can be done. As it stands now I calculate that outstanding shares could go as high as 250mm -- doesn't include the new money. Please correct me if I am wrong. |
|
friedrich
said:
|
... I think that is a promissing company. We have a lot of work here and if the results of phase III of multikind are positves, there will be many people fun because a real nightmare will be finished. It's wortth. Friedrich |
|
Sign Up For Phone Alerts

Is the management at CEL-SCI Corporation (AMEX:CVM) signaling that something big is coming?











